When to send a child to school causes anxiety and confusion for parents

220ad4dcf26042e5ac7e44356415b5a8

In Australia, the rate at which parents are delaying their children’s entry into school appears to be increasing. My research, undertaken with Professor Sue Walker, has indicated that in Queensland, rates of delayed entry to state schools increased between 2010 and 2014. In that five-year period, delayed entry rates almost doubled from 1.5% to 2.9%.

In addition, it was found that boys (64%) were more likely to be delayed to girls.

Why are parents choosing to delay their child’s entry into schooling?

The decision to delay a child’s entry to school has been a concern for parents, scholars and practitioners for a long time.

In earlier literature, the focus on school readiness tended to centre on ways in which children could be assessed to determine whether they were ready for the school environment. More recently, the focus has shifted to considering the ways in which the school environment needs to adapt in order to support each child.

Australian researchers Bob Perry and Sue Dockett contend that while deciding when a child is ready for school should involve consideration of child, family, school and community issues, it is often the child’s characteristics that take precedence in evaluation.

My research analysed the reasons Australian parents gave for having delayed, or currently considering to delay, their child’s school entry. Analysing more than 100 individual discussion posts from an online parenting forum, we were able to identify key considerations parents prioritised when choosing whether or not to delay.

Child’s birth date and the state cut-off

The predominant reason parents gave for delaying their child’s entry was because their child’s birth date was close to the state cut-off.

Parents do not want their child to be one of the youngest in their cohort, perhaps because they fear their child will struggle to keep up with the older children in the class.

Social and emotional readiness

The second most important reason parents gave for delaying was the social and emotional readiness of their child.

Parents felt it was imperative that their child demonstrated appropriate social skills, such as sharing and taking turns, and was able to handle the emotional demands of the school environment.

If parents considered their child unlikely to be socially and emotionally ready, they would delay entry to school.

Issues in the later years of schooling

The next reason parents indicated for delaying school entry was a consideration of the potential issues that may arise for their child in the later years of schooling.

Parents appeared very concerned that if they started their child on time, she/he would be one of the youngest in their year as they approached adolescence and the end of schooling.

Parents wanted their child to have more maturity and be one of the oldest in the class, indicating this would help them deal with the issues that might arise in high school – including peer pressure, drinking alcohol and remaining focused on studying.

Parents’ own experiences

Finally, parents indicated that they relied on their own schooling experiences when considering whether or not to delay.

Parents who had had negative experiences as one of the youngest in their class, or positive experiences being one of the oldest, felt justified in delaying prep entry.

In addition, some parents mentioned that they were teachers, and felt that their experience in the classroom would lead them to delay their child’s school entry.

A difficult decision for parents

It was clear from our analysis that the decision to delay entry into schooling is a highly emotional one for many parents. The discussion forum was full of comments from parents saying they felt overwhelmed, anxious and stressed about this decision.

Parents who had already made the decision indicated that the process was (and in some cases continued to be) emotionally difficult for them. Parents in the process of making the decision indicated their confusion and anxiety as to what was right for their child.

With research studies showing mixed results in relation to whether delayed entry benefits children, it is imperative we undertake more rigorous studies in order to understand why some parents delay.

With this understanding, educational bodies and appropriate professional support personnel may be better placed to provide meaningful support to parents as they make this challenging and highly important decision.
 
Source The ConversationAmanda Mergler

Amanda Mergler is a Senior Lecturer, School of Early Childhood and Inclusive Education, Queensland University of Technology

Login to Download PDF

3 Comments

  1. Sarah Grosvenor   •  

    These 5 points clearly summarise how we felt about our 5 children. First 2 (both boys) held back & no concerns/problems at all. Our 3rd child (daughter) went just on age 5 for social reasons, to help with language delay. She was perpetually in the middle area-able to fall through the net as not a behavioural problem, continually just passing or struggling. She had the opportunity to repeat yr 7 (we live in SA where yr 7 is final Primary school) at another school which covered yr 7-12. She has gone from strength to strength, & is more confident in completing her schooling & going on to further post-high school study. This was not the case while she was in primary years. Across all the children I have had in our home, taught, associated with, I have not seen negative reasons for holding back.

  2. Dawn Roberts   •  

    I did a small study on this topic In scotland as part of my masters if you are interested?

  3. Wendy Groeneveld   •  

    Hi Liz. I find the articles you post to be so informative and helpful. In South Africa, we are like ostriches with our head in the sand when it comes to dyslexia, that’s why I so appreciate Dyslexia Daily. Thanks to your blog, I can at least keep abreast of developments and refresh my knowledge. I’ve completed my masters degree in education through Wits University, specializing within the field of inclusive education. This year, I’ve been accepted to pursue a PhD and I’m keen on differentiated instruction, teaching 21st century skills and incorporating technology into inclusive pedagogy as topics. It has been a nightmare trying to find a permanent teaching post in my own country, despite my qualifications and experience (20 years as a remedial therapist). I’m so frustrated and I think I need to consider moving to Australia to pursue my teaching career there. Is there any way you could possibly advise me with regard to applying for a teaching post in Australia and simultaneously continuing with my PhD studies at an Australian university? Any advice or information you could give me would be greatly appreciated!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>